🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment was understandable. Instead, he brought up the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the world back-to-back. He is more than justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful power on both front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The past few seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

Fritz has made a several significant, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

The American star made a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a terrible game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Down match points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told a journalist in the summer of winning a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {